1. 4 Responses to “Any chance of an update to this review …”

2. By Mikael Rieck on May 7, 2010 | Reply

   Thank you for actually giving a real review and not just rewriting the sales letter from Brad’s site. Hugely beneficial.

   My main concern with the service is in the “spinning” as spun articles will never be as beneficial as unique articles and site that accepts spun content will never have the same quality as sites that accepts unique content only. Am I wrong and shouldn’t I be concerned about that?

   Thanks
   Mikael

3. By Vita Vee on May 12, 2010 | Reply

   Hi Mikael,

   You’re not wrong. Unique content is still king and a blog with 100% unique content will be stronger than a blog with spun articles. Mainly because the majority of people don’t know how to spin articles properly.

   If you spin your articles well enough you can get the same results as if you were using a new article. But this involves spinning at several levels – at least paragraph + sentence level.

   Spinning at the words level only will give poor results.

   VV

4. By Baz on Jun 28, 2010 | Reply

   Any chance of an update to this review on your findings now?

   My personal experience shows blog quality to be really poor – lots low quality blogs thrown up purely for this purpose, no authority, barely indexed, with poor templates on cheap keyword stuffed 99c domains. And poor quality control of the articles published..!

5. By Vita Vee on Jun 28, 2010 | Reply

   Hey Baz,

   I’m still using it (well rather my link builder) as a complement to some other submission softwares.

   After posting this review I have not continued tracking which sites publishing my articles are from the SLV network.

   If I can find some time I’ll try to run a new test. Thanks for asking.

   V2
   http://vitavee.com/forums

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.